“What are clauses for?
Understanding grammar in terms of social action”

 

Sandra A. Thompson

LSA

January 5, 2005

<sathomps@linguistics.ucsb.edu>

 

References

Interactional Linguistics Bibliography: http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/sathomps/bibliographies/bibliog-in teractional-linguistics.htm

Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English: Du Bois, John W. et al. 2000-2005. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Parts 1-4. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. <http://www.ldc.upenn.edu>

=======================================================

Auer, Peter. 1996. On the prosody and syntax of turn-taking. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, eds., Prosody and conversation, 57-100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Auer, Peter. 2005. Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25.1: 7-36.

Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer. 1994. ‘A Schema-based approach to grammatical description.’ In S. Lima, R. Corrigan, and G. Iverson, eds. The Reality of Linguistic Rules. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Bates, Elizabeth and Judith C. Goodman. 1999. On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In Brian MacWhinney, ed., The emergence of language, 29-79. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bowerman, Melissa (1982). Evaluating competing linguistic models with language acquisition data: Implications of developmental errors with causative verbs. Quaderni di Semantica 3, 5-66.

Bowerman, Melissa (1985). What shapes children's grammars? In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition vol. 2, 1257-1319. Hillsdale , NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bowerman, Melissa (1990). Mapping thematic roles onto syntactic functions: Are children helped by innate linking rules? Linguistics 28, 1253-1289.

Bowerman, Melissa. 1996. Argument structure and learnability: is a solution in sight? BLS 22: 454-468.

Bybee, Joan. 1998. A functionalist approach to grammar and its evolution. Evolution of communication 2.2: 249-278.

Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: the mind's response to repetition. Language.

Bybee, Joan. To appear. Frequency of use and the shape of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Choi, Soonja. 1999. Early development of verb structures and caregiver input in Korean: two case studies. International Journal of Bilingualism 3.2/3: 241-265.

Clancy, Patricia. 2004. T he discourse basis of constructions: some evidence from Korean acquisition. In Eve Clark, ed., Constructions and acquisition (Proceedings of the 32nd Stanford Child Language Research Forum): http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/CLRF/2004/CLRF-2004-toc.html

Clark, Herbert H. 1992. Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Croft, William. 1998a. Event structure in argument linking. In Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder, eds., The projection of arguments, 21-63. Chicago: CSLI Publications.

Croft, William. 1998b. The structure of events and the structure of language. In Michael Tomasello, ed., The new psychology of language, 67-92. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1996. Intonation and clause combining in discourse: the case of because. Pragmatics 6.3:389-426.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2004. Prosody and sequence organization in English conversation. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Cecilia E. Ford, eds., Sound patterns in interaction, 335-376. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Cecilia E. Ford, eds., 2004. Sound patterns in interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret Selting, eds. 1996. Prosody and conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dryer, Matthew. 1989. Discourse-governed word order and word-order typology. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 4.

Dryer, Matthew. 1995. Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order. In M. Noonan and Pamela Downing, eds., Word order in discourse, 105-135. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Dryer, Matthew. 1997a. On the 6-way word order typology. Studies in language 21: 69-103.

Dryer, Matthew. 1997b. Are grammatical relations universal? In Joan Bybee, John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Essays on language function and language type, 115-143. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Du Bois, John W. 2003. Argument structure: grammar in use. In Du Bois, John W., Lorraine E. Kumpf, and William J. Ashby, eds. 2003. Preferred argument structure: grammar as architecture for function, 10-60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Duranti, Alessandro and Elinor Ochs. 1979. Left-dislocation in Italian conversation. In Talmy Givón, ed., Discourse and syntax, 377-416. New York: Academic Press.

Englebretson, Robert. 2003. Searching for structure: the problem of complementation in colloquial Indonesian conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ewing , Michael C. 2005. Grammar and inference in conversation: identifying clause structure in spoken Javanese. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Fillmore, Charles J. 1996. The pragmatics of constructions. In Dan Slobin, ed., Social interaction, social context, and language: essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Fillmore, Charles, Paul Kay, Laura A. Michaelis, and Ivan A. Sag. 2003. Construction Grammar. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Ford, Cecilia E. 2000. The treatment of contrasts in interaction. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Bernd Kortmann, eds., Cause, Condition, Concession, and Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, 283-312. Mouton de Gruyter.

Ford, Cecilia E. 2001a. Denial and the construction of conversational turns. In Joan Bybee and Michael Noonan, eds., Complex sentences in grammar and discourse, 61-78. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Ford, Cecilia E. 2001b. At the intersection of turn and sequence: negation and what comes next. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret Selting, eds., Interactional linguistics, 51-79.

Ford, Cecilia E. 2004. Contingency and units in interaction. Discourse Studies 6.1: 27-52.

Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2002. Social Interaction and grammar. In Michael Tomasello, ed., The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, Vol. 2, 119-143. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ford, Cecilia E. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the projection of turn completion. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and grammar, 135-184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Geluykens, Ronald. 1988. The interactional nature of referent-introduction. Chicago Linguistic Society 24.1: 141-154. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Geluykens, Ronald. 1992. From discourse process to grammatical construction: on left dislocation in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Golato, Andrea. 2005. Compliments and compliment responses: their grammatical structure and sequential organization. Benjamins.

Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Goodwin, Charles. 1981. Conversational organization: interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.

Goodwin, Charles. 1996. Transparent Vision. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 1992. Assessments and the construction of context. In Charles Goodwin and Alessandro Duranti, eds., Rethinking context, 147-189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Günthner, Susanne. 1996. From subordination to coordination? Verb-second position in German causal and concessive constructions. Pragmatics 6.3: 323-356.

Günthner, Susanne. 1996. The prosodic contextualization of moral work: an analysis of reproaches in 'why'-formats. In Couper-Kuhlen and Selting 1996, 271-302.

Hayashi, Makoto. 2003. Joint utterance construction in Japanese conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Hayashi, Makoto. 2004. Projection and grammar: notes on the 'action-projecting' use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of pragmatics 36.8: 1337-1374.

Hayashi, Makoto and Junko Mori. 1998. Co-construction in Japanese revisited: we do 'finish each other's sentences'. In Akatsuka, Noriko, Hajime Hoji, Shoichi Iwasaki, Sung-Ock Sohn, and Susan Strauss, eds., Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 7, 77-93. Stanford: CSLI.

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2001: Emerging syntax for interaction: Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interaction. In: Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics, 25-50. John Benjamins. Amsterdam.

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2001. Syntax in the making: the emergence of syntactic units in Finnish conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2004. Shared syntax: the grammar of co-construction. Journal of pragmatics 36.8: 1315-1336.

Hopper, Paul. 1987. Emergent grammar. BLS 13, 139-157.

Hopper, Paul. 1997. Discourse and the category 'verb' in English. Language and communication 17.2: 93-102.

Hopper, Paul, J. 1998. Emergent grammar. In Michael Tomasello, ed., The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 155-175. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hopper, Paul. 2000. Grammatical Constructions and their Discourse Origins: Prototype or Family Resemblance? In Martin Pütz and Susanne Niemeier, eds., Applied Cognitive Linguistics: Theory, Acquisition and Language Pedagogy. Berlin: Mouton/de Gruyter.

Hunston, Susan and Gill Francis. 1999. Pattern grammar: a corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Israel, Michael. 1996. The way constructions grow. In Adele Goldberg, ed., 217-230. Conceptual structure, discourse, and language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Jurafsky, Daniel. 1996. A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive Science 20: 137-194.

Kelly, Barbara F. 2004. The development of constructions through gesture use. In Eve Clark, ed., Constructions and acquisition (Proceedings of the 32nd Stanford Child Language Research Forum): http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/CLRF/2004/CLRF-2004-toc.html

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, Ronald W . 1991. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Langacker, Ronald W . 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Lerner, Gene H. 1991. On the syntax of sentences in progress. Language in Society 20:441-458.

Lerner, Gene H. 1996. On the 'semi-permeable' character of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and grammar, 238-271 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Liddicoat, Anthony J. 2004. The projectability of turn constructional units and the role of prediction in listening. Discourse studies 6.4: 449-469.

Mithun, Marianne. 1987. Is basic word order universal? In R. Tomlin, ed., Coherence and grounding in discourse, 281-328. And in D. Payne, ed., 1992. Pragmatics of word order flexibility, 15-61. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Mithun, Marianne 2003. Pronouns and agreement: The information status of pronominal affixes. Transactions of the Philological Society, London: Blackwell. 101.2:235-278.

Mithun, Marianne. In press. Linguistics in the face of language endangerment. In W. Leo Wetzels, ed., Language Endangerment and Endangered Languages. Publications of the Research School of Asian African, and Amerindian Studies. Leiden: Leiden University.

Ochs, Elinor. 1988. Culture and language development: language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 1996. Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ochs, Elinor and Bambi Schieffelin. 1976. Foregrounding referents: a reconsideration of left dislocation in discourse. Ochs, Elinor and Bambi Scheiffelin, eds., 1983, Acquiring conversational competence, 158-174. London: Routledge.

Ono, Tsuyoshi and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. Interaction and syntax in the structure of conversational discourse. In Eduard Hovy and Donia Scott, eds., Discourse Processing: an interdicsiplinary perspective, 67-96. Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag.

Ono, Tsuyoshi and Sandra A. Thompson. 1997. Deconstructing 'zero anaphora'. BLS 23: 481-491.

Payne, Doris. 1986. Basic constituent order in Yagua clauses: implications for word order universals. In D. Derbyshire and G. Pullum, eds., Handbook of Amazonian languages, 440-465. Berlin: Mouton.

Payne, Doris. 1990. The pragmatics of word order: typological dimensions of verb-initial languages. Berlin: Mouton.

Payne, Doris, ed. 1992. Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2001. Dislocation à gauche et organisation interactionnelle. Marges Linguistiques vol. 2, 177-194.

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik.   1985.   A comprehensive grammar of the English language.   London: Longman.

Ratitamkul, Theeraporn, Adele E. Goldberg, Cynthia Fisher. 2004. The role of discourse context in determining the argument structure of novel verbs with omitted arguments. In Eve Clark, ed., Constructions and acquisition (Proceedings of the 32nd Stanford Child Language Research Forum): http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/CLRF/2004/CLRF-2004-toc.html

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50.4:696-735.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1989. Reflections on language, development, and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In Marc H. Bornstein and Jerome S. Bruner, eds., Interaction in human development, 139-153. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: one direction for inquiry into grammar and interaction. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and grammar, 52-133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. In press. A primer in conversation analysis: sequence organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scheibman, Joanne. 2002. Point of view and grammar: Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Scollon, Ronald. 1976. Conversations with a one-year-old. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Steensig, Jakob. 2001. Notes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkish conversation. In Margret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics, 259-286.

Streeck, Jürgen. 1995. On projection. In Esther N. Goody, ed., Social intelligence and interaction, 87-110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Szatrowski, Polly. 2002. Syntactic projectability and co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 28: 315-326.

Szatrowski, Polly. To appear. When do Japanese speakers co-construct utterances? In Noda, Mari and Patricia Wetzel, eds., Language in culture. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.

Takagi, Tomoyo. 2002. Contextual resources for inferring unexpressed referents in Japanese conversation. Pragmatics 12.2: 135-182.

Tanaka, Hiroko. 1999. Turn-taking in Japanese conversation: a study in grammar and interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Tanaka, Hiroko. 2000. Turn-projection in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Research on language and social interaction 33.1: 1-38.

Tanaka, Hiroko. 2001. Adverbials for turn projection in Japanese: toward a demystification of the "telepathic" mode of communication. Language in Society 30: 559-587.

Tannen, Deborah, ed. 1993. Framing in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tao, Hongyin. 1996. Units in Mandarin conversation: prosody, discourse and grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Tao, Hongyin. 2003. A usage-based approach to argument structure: 'remember' and 'forget' in spoken English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8.1: 75–95.

Tao, Liang. 1993. Zero Anaphora in Chinese: Cognitive Strategies in Discourse Processing, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado.

Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. 'Object complements' and conversation: towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26.1: 125-164.

Thompson, Sandra A. and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2005. The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies 7.4/5: 481-505.

Thompson, Sandra A. and Paul J. Hopper. 2001. Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: evidence from conversation. In Bybee, Joan L. and Paul J. Hopper, eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 27-60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Tomasello, Michael. 1999. The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tsao, Feng-fu. 1979. A Functional Study of Topic in Chinese: The First Step Towards Discourse Analysis. Taipei: Student Book Co.

Uhmann, Susanne. 1996. On rhythm in everyday German conversation: beat clashes in assessment utterances. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, ed., Prosody in conversation, 303-365. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Uhmann, Susanne. 2001. Some arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversation. Studies in Interactional Linguistics. M. Selting and E. Couper-Kuhlen, eds. Amsterdam, Benjamins: 373-404.