(works mostly in English)

(not exhaustive)

(not including language acquisition)

Sandra A. Thompson

Updated as of July 18, 2008

Useful introductions to Conversation Analysis

Charles Antaki's website, offering an overview of CA with a hands-on transcription tutorial: : http://www-staff.lboro.ac.uk/%7Essca1/sitemenu.htm

Drew, Paul. 2005. Conversation Analysis. In Fitch, Kristine L. and Robert E. Sanders, eds., Handbook of language and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Heritage, John. 1989. Current developments in conversation analysis. In D. Roger and P. Bull, eds., Conversation: an interdisciplinary perspective, 21-36. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Hutchby, Ian and Robin Wooffitt. 1998. Conversation analysis: principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Levinson, Stephan. 1983. Chap. 6 from: Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mey, Jacob. 1993. Pragmatics, chaps. 10-12. Oxford: Blackwell.

Nofsinger, Robert E. 1991. Everyday conversation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Pomerantz, A.  1984.  Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.  In Atkinson, J.M., J. Heritage, eds.            Structure of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Pomerantz, Anita and B. J. Fehr. 1997. Conversation analysis: an approach to the study of social action as sene making practices. In Teun A. van Dijk, ed., Discourse as social interaction, 65-91. London: Sage.

Psathas, George. 1995. Conversation analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. In press. A primer in conversation analysis: sequence organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1994. Approaches to discourse, chap. 7. Oxford: Blackwell.

ten Have, Paul. 1999. Doing conversation analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

________________________________________________________________________________

Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English

Du Bois, John W. et al. 2000-2005. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Parts 1-4. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.

http://www.ldc.upenn.edu

Part 1: Du Bois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2000. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part One. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.

http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/Catalog/CatalogEntry.jsp?catalogId=LDC2000S85

Part 2: Du Bois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, Sandra A. Thompson, and Nii Martey. 2003. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Two. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.

http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/Catalog/CatalogEntry.jsp?catalogId=LDC2003S06

Part 3: Du Bois, John W. and Robert Englebretson. 2004. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Three. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.

http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/Catalog/CatalogEntry.jsp?catalogId=LDC2004S10

Part 4: Du Bois, John W. and Robert Englebretson. 2005. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Four. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.

http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/Catalog/CatalogEntry.jsp?catalogId=LDC2005S25

____________________________________________________________________________________

Transcription Systems Widely Used in Interactional Linguistics

For Conversation Analysis: Atkinson, J. Maxwell and John Heritage, eds. 1984. Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis, ix - xvi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tutorial: http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty/schegloff/TranscriptionProject/index.html

For the Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English: Du Bois, John, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino, and Susanna Cumming. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert, eds., Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research, 45-89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

and: http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/projects/transcription/representing

For GAT: Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, et al. 1998. Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem (GAT). Linguistische Berichte173: 91-122.

__________________________________________________________________________________

"Interaction and Linguistic Structures" (InLiSt) publications:

<http://www.uni-potsdam.de/u/inlist/index.htm>

__________________________________________________________________________________

Akatsuka, Noriko. 1997. On the co-construction of counterfactual reasoning. Journal of pragmatics 18: 781-794.

Akatsuka, Noriko and Patricia M. Clancy. 1993. Conditionality and deontic modality in Japanese and Korean: Evidence from the emergence of conditionals. Japanese/Korean Linguistics, 2, 177-192.

Akatsuka, Noriko McCawley and Susan Strauss. 2000. Counterfactual reasoning and desirability. In Kortmann, Bernd and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Cause - condition - concession - contrast, 205-234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Altenberg, Bengt. 1987. Prosodic patterns in spoken English: studies in the correlation between prosody and grammar. Lund: Lund University Press.

Altenberg, Bengt. 1987. Causal ordering strategies in English conversation. In J. Monaghan, ed., Grammar in the construction of texts, 50-64. London: Frances Pinter.

Ariel, Mira. 2004. Most. Language 80.4: 658-706.

Ashby, William J.. 1981. The loss of the negative particle ne in French: a syntactic change in progress. Language 674-687.

Ashby, William J.. 1988. The syntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics of left- and right-dislocations in French. Lingua 76:203-229.

Ashby, William J. 1992. The variable use of on versus tu/vous for indefinite reference in spoken French. Journal of French Language Studies 2: 135-157.

Ashby, William J. 1994. An acoustic profile of right-dislocations in French. French language studies 4: 127-145.

Ashby, William J. 1997. The negative variable (ne) in spoken French: a change in progress? UC Santa Barbara ms.

Ashby, William and Paola Bentivoglio. 1993. Preferred argument structure in spoken French and Spanish. Language variation and change 5:61-76.

Ashby, William J. and Paola Bentivoglio. 1997. Strategies for introducing new referents into discourse: a comparative analysis of French and Spanish presentational structures. In Robert M. Hammond and Marguerita G. MacDonald, eds., Linguistic studies in honor of Bohdan Saciuk. West Lafayette, IN: Learning Systems, Inc., 9-26.

Auer, Peter. 1992. The neverending sentence: rightward expansion in spoken language. In Miklós Kontra and Tamás Váradi, eds., Studies in spoken languages: English, German, Finno-Ugric, 41-59. Budapest: Linguistics Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

Auer, Peter. 1996. On the prosody and syntax of turn-taking. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, eds., Prosody and conversation, 57-100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Auer, Peter. 2000. Pre- and post-positioning of wenn-clauses in spoken and written German. InLiSt No. 15. University of Konstanz.

Auer, Peter. 2005. Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25.1: 7-36.

Auer, Peter. 2005. Syntax asl Prozess. InList No. 41. University of Konstanz. http://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/2005/1559/

Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2002. On the development of final though: a case of grammaticalization? In Wischer, Ilse and Gabriele Diewalds, eds., New reflections on grammaticalization, 345-361. Benjamins.

Bates, Elizabeth and Judith C. Goodman. 1999. On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In Brian MacWhinney, ed., The emergence of language, 29-79. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bentivoglio, Paola. 1992. Linguistic correlations between subjects of one-argument verbs and subjects of more-argument verbs in spoken Spanish. In P. Hirschbühler and K. Koerner, eds., Romance languages and modern linguistic theory, 11-24. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Bentivoglio, Paola. 1993. Full NPs in spoken Spanish: a discourse profile. In W. Ashby, M. Mithun, G. Perissinotto, and E. Raposo, eds., Linguistic perspectives on the Romance languages, 211-224. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Bentivoglio, Paola. 1998. Newness, animacy and continuity of reference in spoken Spanish. Lingua Americana II.2: 22-37.

Bentivoglio, Paola and Elizabeth G. Weber. 1986. A functional approach to subject word order in spoken Spanish. In Osvaldo Jaeggli and Carmen Silva-Corvalán, eds., Studies in Romance linguistics, 23-40. Dordrecht: Foris.

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.

Biq, Yung-O. 1990. Conversation, continuation, and connectives. Text 10.3: 187-208.

Biq, Yung-O. 1990. Question-words as hedges in conversational Chinese: a Q and R exercise. In Lawrence B. Bouton and Yamuna Kachru, eds., Pragmatics and language learning, 141-157. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Biq, Yung-O. 1991. The multiple uses of the second person singular pronoun in conversational Mandarin. Journal of pragmatics 16: 307-321.

Biq, Yung-O. 1993. From TV Talk to Screen Caption. Text 13.3: 351-369.

Biq, Yung-O. 1995. Chinese causal sequencing and yinwei in conversation and press reportage. Berkeley Linguistics Society 21: 47-60.

Biq, Yung-O. 2001. The grammaticalization of jiushi and jiushishuo in Mandarin Chinese. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics 27.2: 103-124.

Biq, Yung-O. 2004. Construction, reanalysis, and stance: ‘V yi ge N’
and variations in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 36.9: 1655-1672.

Biq, Yung-O. 2004. People, things and stuff: general nouns in spoken Mandarin. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 30.1: 41-64.

Bolden, Galina. 2004. The quote and beyond: Defining boundaries of reported speech in conversational Russian. Journal of Pragmatics, 36.6: 1071-1118.

Bublitz, Wolfram. 1992. Transferred negation and modality. Journal of pragmatics 18:551-577.

Button, Graham and Neil Casey. 1984. Generating topic: the use of topic initial elicitors. In J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, eds., Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis, 167-190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, Joan. 1998. The emergent lexicon. CLS 34: 421-435.

Bybee, Joan. 1998. A functionalist approach to grammar and its evolution. Evolution of communication 2.2: 249-278.

Bybee, Joan. 2001. Frequency effects on French liaison. In: Bybee, Joan L. and Paul J. Hopper, eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 337-359. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, Joan. 2001. Main clauses are innovative, subordinate clauses are conservative: consequences for the nature of constructions. In Bybee, Joan and Michael Noonan, eds., Complex sentences in grammar and discourse, 1-17. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Bybee, Joan. 2002. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of repetition. In Richard Janda and Brian Joseph (eds.) Handbook of historical linguistics, 602-623. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bybee, Joan. 2002. Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In T. Givon and Bertram Malle, eds., The evolution of language from pre-language, 109-132. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: the mind's response to repetition. Language 82.4: 529-551 .

Bybee, Joan. 2007. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bybee, Joan and David Eddington. 2006. A usage-based exemplar model approach to Spanish verbs of 'becoming'. Language.

Bybee, Joan and Paul Hopper. 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Bybee, Joan and Joanne Scheibman. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don't in English. Linguistics 37.3: 575-596.

Bybee, Joan and Sandra A. Thompson. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 378-388. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Carter, Ronald and Michael McCarthy. 1995. Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics 16.2: 141-58.

Chafe, Wallace. 1984. How people use adverbial clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society 10: 437-449. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Chafe, Wallace. 1986. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Johanna Nichols and Wallace Chafe, eds., Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology, 261-272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russell Tomlin, ed., Coherence and grounding in discourse, 21- 51. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Chafe, Wallace. 1988. Linking intonation units in spoken English. In John Haiman and Sandra A. Thompson, ed., Clause combining in discourse and grammar, 1-27. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Chafe, Wallace. 1992. Intonation units and prominences in English natural discourse. Proceedings of the IRCS Workshop on Prosody in Natural Speech, 41-52. Institute for Research in Cognitive Science Report No. 92-37. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

Chafe, Wallace. 1993. Prosodic and functional units of language. In Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert, eds., Talking data: transcription and coding methods for language research, 33-43. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: the flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Chang, Chung-yin. 1997. A discourse analysis of questions in Mandarin conversation. National Taiwan University MA thesis.

Chang, Li-Hsiang. 2003. Linguistic subjectivity and the use of the Mandarin LE in conversation. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.

Chappell, Hilary. 1991. Strategies for the assertion of obviousness and disagreement in Mandarin: a semantic study of the modal particle me. Australian Journal of Linguistics 11: 39-65.

Chappell, Hilary and Sandra A. Thompson. 1992. The semantics and pragmatics of Associative DE in Mandarin discourse. Cahiers Linguistiques Asie Orientale XXI: 199-229.

Chen, Shu-Ching Susan. 1997. A discourse analysis of relative clauses in spoken Chinese: a study based on grammatical reflexes and information structure. Taipei: National Taiwan University Master's thesis.

Chen, Shu-Ching Susan. 1998. A discourse analysis of relative clauses in spoken Chinese. In Hua Lin, ed., Proceedings of the ninth North American conference on Chinese linguistics, vol. 2, 53-70. Los Angeles: Graduate Students in Linguistics, University of Southern California.

Cheshire, Jenny. 1996. That jacksprat: An interactional perspective on English that. Journal of Pragmatics 25.3: 369-393.

Chui, Kawai. 1994. Information Flow in Mandarin Chinese Discourse, PhD dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University.

Clancy, Patricia M. 2007 Deontic conditionals and desirability: Structure and socialization in child-directed speech. In S. Kuno, S. Makino, & S. Strauss, eds., Festschrift for Noriko Akatsuka, 1-11. Tokyo: Kurosio.

Clancy, Patricia M., Sandra A. Thompson, Ryoko Suzuki, and Hongyin Tao. 1996. The Conversational use of reactive tokens in Japanese, Mandarin, and English. Journal of Pragmatics 26.1: 355-387.

Clancy, Patricia M., Noriko Akatsuka, and Susan Strauss. 1997. Deontic modality and conditionality in discourse: a cross-linguistic study of adult speech to young children. In Akio Kamio, ed., Directions in functional linguistics, 19-57. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Clark, Herbert H. 1989. Contributing to discourse. Cognitive science 13: 259-294. [Also in Clark 1992]

Clark, Herbert H. 1992. Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, Herbert H. and J. E. Fox Tree. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speech. Cognition 84: 73-111.

Clark, Herbert H. and Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66.4: 764-805.

Clark, Herbert H. and Mija M. van der Wege. 2002. Psycholinguistics. In D.L. Medin, ed., Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology, third edition: Cognition, 209-259. New York: John Wiley.

Clark, Herbert H. and Thomas Wasow. 1998. Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology 37: 201-242.

Clark, Herbert H. and Deanna Wilkes-Gibbs. 1986. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22: 1-39. [Also in Clark 1999.]

Clift, Rebecca. 2001. Meaning in interaction: the case of actually. Language 77.2: 245-291.

Cook, Haruko Minegishi. 1992. Meanings of non-referential indexes: a case study of the Japanese sentence-final ne. Text 12.4: 507-539.

Cote, Sharon. 1997. Elaboration: a function and a form. BLS 23: 402-410.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1992. Contextualizing discourse: The prosody of interactive repair. In Aldo di Luzio and Peter Auer, eds., The contextualization of language, 337-364. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1993. English speech rhythm: form and function in everyday verbal interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1995. On the foregrounded progressive in American conversational narrative: a new development. Anglistentag 1994 Graz Proceedings, 229-245. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1996. Intonation and clause combining in discourse: the case of because. Pragmatics 6.3: 389-426.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1999. Varieties of conditionals and their emergence in discourse. In Aditi Lahiri, Alexander Pasterovsky, Christophe Strauss, eds., Arbeitspapier 99: Issues in interdisciplinary research on the lexicon, 89-130. Konstanz: University of Konstanz.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1999. Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech. In Wolfram Bublitz & Uta Lenk, eds., Coherence in spoken and written discourse: how to create it and how to describe it. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 11-32.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2000. Prosody. In Verscheuren, Jef, Jan-Ola Ostman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, eds., Handbook of Pragmatics 2000. 1-19. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2001. Interactional prosody: high onsets in reason-for-the-call turns. Language in Society 30: 29-53.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2004. Prosody and sequence organization in English conversation. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Cecilia E. Ford, eds., Sound patterns in interaction, 335-376. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2006. Situated phonologies: Patterns of phonology in discourse contexts. In Martha Pennington, ed., Phonology in Context. Advances in Linguistics Series 1, 186-218. Houndmills, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. To appear. Some truths and untruths about final intonation in conversational questions.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Peter Auer, and Frank Müller. 1999. Language in Time: The rhythm and tempo of spoken interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Cecilia E. Ford, eds., 2004. Sound patterns in interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Ono, T. 2007. 'Incrementing’ in conversation. a comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Tsuyoshi Ono, eds., Turn continuation in cross-linguistic perspective. Pragmatics 17.4: 513-552.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Tsuyoshi Ono, eds. 2007. Turn continuation in cross-linguistic perspective. Pragmatics 17.4.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret Selting, eds. 1996. Prosody and conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Margret Selting, Peter Auer et al., 1998. Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem. Linguistische Berichte, 173, 91-122.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Sandra A. Thompson. 1999. On the concessive relation in conversational English, in Fritz-Wilhelm Neumann and Sabine Schuelting, eds.: Anglistentag 1998 Erfurt: Proceedings: 29-39 Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Sandra A. Thompson. 2000. Concessive patterns in conversation. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Bernd Kortmann, eds., Cause, condition, concession, and contrast: cognitive and discourse perspectives, 381-410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Sandra A. Thompson. 2005. A linguistic practice for retracting overstatements: concessive repair. In Auli Haulinen and Margret Selting, eds., Syntax and lexis in conversation, 257-288. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Sandra A. Thompson. To appear. 'You know it's funny': Eine Neubetrachtung der 'Extraposition' im Englischen. ['You know, it's funny': English 'extraposition' revisited]. In Guenthner, Susanne and Wolfgang Imo, eds., Konstruktionen in der Interaktion. Berlin, de Gruyter.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Sandra A. Thompson. To appear. On assessing situations and events in conversation: ‘Extraposition’ and its relatives. Discourse Studies.

Crystal, David. 1979. Neglected grammatical factors in conversational English. In Sydney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik, eds., Studies in English linguistics, 153-166. London: Longman.

Curl, Traci S. 2005. Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: the phonetic differentiation of 'repetitions'. Discourse Processes 39(1):1-44.

Curl, Traci S. 2006. Offers of assistance: constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics. 38:1257-1280

Dahl, Östen. 1997. Egocentricity in discourse and syntax. http://www.ling.su.se/staff/oesten/egocentric.

Davidson, J. 1984. Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J.M Atkinson and J. Heritage, eds. Structures of social action, 102-28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Delahunty, Gerald and Laura Gatzkiewicz. 2000. On the Spanish inferential construction ser que. Pragmatics 10.3: 301-322.

Depperman, Arnulf. To appear. Conversational interpretation of lexical items and conversational contrasting. In Hakulinen, Auli and Margret Selting, eds., Syntax and lexis in conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Downing, Pamela. 1996. Proper names as a referential option in English conversation. In Barbara Fox, ed., Studies in anaphora, 95-143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Drew, Paul and Elizabeth Holt. 1988. Complainable matters: the use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social problems 35.4: 398-417.

Drew, Paul and Elizabeth Holt. 1998. Figures of speech: idiomatic expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society 27: 495-523.

Drew, Paul and Traci Curl. To appear. Going too far: complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of pragmatics.

Du Bois, John. 1991. Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research. Pragmatics 1:71-106.

Du Bois, John W. 2000. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English. CD-ROM. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. [www.ldc.upenn.edu/Publications/SBC/ or <dubois@linguistics.ucsb.edu>]

Du Bois, John W. 2001. Discourse and grammar. In Michael Tomasello, ed., The new psychology of language, vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Du Bois, John W., Lorraine E. Kumpf, and William J. Ashby, eds. 2003. Preferred argument structure: grammar as architecture for function. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Du Bois, John W. 2003. Argument structure: grammar in use. In Du Bois, John W., Lorraine E. Kumpf, and William J. Ashby, eds. 2003. Preferred argument structure: grammar as architecture for function, 10-60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Du Bois, John. 2001. Towards a dialogic syntax. Ms., UC Santa Barbara.

Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson, ed. Stancetaking in discourse: subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Du Bois, John and Stephan Schuetze-Coburn. 1993. Representing hierarchy: constituent structure for discourse databases. Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert, eds., Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research, 221-260. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino, and Susanna Cumming. 1992. Discourse transcription. Volume 4 of Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, UC Santa Barbara.

Du Bois, John, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino, and Susanna Cumming. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert, eds., Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research, 45-89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Du Bois, John and Sandra A. Thompson. 1993. Dimensions of a theory of information flow, ms., UC Santa Barbara.

Duranti, Alessandro. 1984. The social meaning of subject pronouns in Italian conversation. Text 4.4.

Duranti, Alessandro. 1986. The audience as co-author. Text 6:239-247.

Duranti, Alessandro. 1990. Politics and grammar: agency in Samoan pollitical discourse. American Ethnologist 17: 646-666.

Duranti, Alessandro. 1994. From grammar to politics: linguistic anthropology in a western Samoan village. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Duranti, Alessandro and Elinor Ochs. 1979. Left-dislocation in Italian conversation. In Talmy Givón, ed., Discourse and syntax, 377-416. New York: Academic Press.

Duranti, Alessandro and Elinor Ochs. 1990. Genitive constructions and agency in Samoan discourse. Studies in language 14.l:1-23.

Durie, Mark. 1988. Preferred argument structure in an active language: arguments against the category 'intransitive subject'. Lingua 74:1-25.

Durie, Mark. 1994. Pragmatic linking in Acehnese. Text 14.4:495-529.

Dutra, Rosalia. 1987. The hybrid S category in Brazilian Portuguese: sosme implications for word order. Studies in language 11: 163-180.

Egbert, Maria. 1997. Some interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multiperson conversation. Journal of Pragmatics. 27, 611-634.

Egbert, Maria. 1997. Schisming: the collaborative transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations. Research in Language and Social Interaction Vol. 30.1: 1-51.

Egbert, Maria. 1996. Context-sensitivity in conversation: eye gaze and the German repair initiator bitte?. Language in Society 25:4.

Egbert, Maria. 2005. Interaction as a resource for lexis, semantics and word class – arguments for considering the German self-repair initiators ehm and eh as words. In Hakulinen, Auli and Margret Selting, eds. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Benjamins

Ellis, Nick C. 2002. Frequency effects in language acquisition: a review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

Elman, Jeffery L., Elizabeth A. Bates, Mark H. Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Domenico Parisi, Kim Plunkett. 1996. Rethinking Innateness
A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Englebretson, Robert. 1997a. Genre and grammar: predicative and attributive adjectives in spoken English. BLS 23: 411-421.

Englebretson, Robert. 1997b. Why don't all the adjectives go there? Semantic classification of adjectives in conversational English. Paper presented at Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language 3, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Englebretson, Robert. 2003. Searching for structure: the problem of complementation in colloquial Indonesian conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Robert Englebretson, ed. 2007. Stancetaking in discourse: subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Erickson, Frederick. 1992. They know all the lines: rhythmic organization and contextualization in a conversational listing routine. In Peter Auer and Aldo di Luzio, eds., The contextualization of language, 365-397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Erman, Britt. 2001. Pragmatic markers with a focus on you know in adult and adolescent talk. Journal of pragmatics 33: 1337-1359.

Erman, Britt and Beatrice Warren. 2000. The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text 20.1:29-62.

Ewing , Michael C. 1991. The discourse functions of relative clauses in Indonesian. BLS 17: 81-91.

Ewing , Michael C. 1995. Two pathways to identifiability in Cirebon Javanese. BLS 21, Special session on discourse in Southeast Asian languages: 72-82.

Ewing , Michael C. 2005. Grammar and inference in conversation: identifying clause structure in spoken Javanese. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Ewing, Michael. 2005. Hierarchical constituency in conversational language: the case of Cirebon Javanese. Studies in language 29.1: 89-112.

Falk, Jane. 1980. The conversational duet. Berkeley Linguistics Society 6: 507-514.

Field, Margaret. 1997. The role of factive predicates in the indexicalization of stance: a discourse perspective. Journal of pragmatics 27.6: 799-814.

Ferrara, Kathleen. 1992. The interactive achievement of a sentence: joint productions in therapeutic discourse. Discourse processes 15:207-228.

Ferrara, Kathleen. 1994. Therapeutic ways with words. Oxford University Press.Fincke, Steven.

Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie. 2000. The change from pronoun to clitic to prefix and the rise of null subjects in spoken Swiss French. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.

Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in interaction: adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ford, Cecilia E. 1997. Speaking conditionally: some contexts for if-clauses in conversation. In A. Athanasiadou and R. Dirven, eds., On conditionals again, 387-413. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ford, Cecilia E. 2000. The treatment of contrasts in interaction. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Bernd Kortmann, eds., Cause, Condition, Concession, and Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, 283-312. Mouton de Gruyter.

Ford, Cecilia E. 2001. Denial and the construction of conversational turns. In Joan Bybee and Michael Noonan, eds., Complex sentences in grammar and discourse, 61-78. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Ford, Cecilia E. 2001. At the intersection of turn and sequence: negation and what comes next. In Selting, Margret and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics, 51-79. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Ford, Cecilia E. 2004. Contingency and units in interaction. Discourse Studies 6.1: 27-52.

Ford, Cecilia E. and Barbara A. Fox. 1996. Interactional motivations for reference formulation: He had. This guy had, a beautiful, thirty-two O:lds. In Barbara Fox, ed., Studies in anaphora, 145-168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. Practices in the Construction of Turns: the 'TCU' revisited. Pragmatics 6.3: 427-454.

Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2002. Social Interaction and grammar. In Michael Tomasello, ed., The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, Vol. 2, 119-143. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 2002. The language of turn and sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2002. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In Cecilia Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds. The language of turn and sequence, 14-38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ford, Cecilia E. and Junko Mori. 1994. Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: a cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar. Pragmatics 4.1:31-62.

Ford, Cecilia E. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1986. Conditionals in discourse: a text-based study from English, in Elizabeth C. Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy S. Reilly, and Charles A. Ferguson, eds., On Conditionals, 353-372. Cambridge University Press.

Ford, Cecilia E. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the projection of turn completion. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and grammar, 135-184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fox, Barbara A. 1986. Local patterns and general principles in cognitive processes: anaphora in writtten and conversational English. Text 6:25-51.

Fox, Barbara A. 1987. Anaphora and the structure of discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fox, Barbara. 1987. The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy: subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis? Language 63:856-70.

Fox, Barbara A. 1994. Contextualization, indexicality, and the distributed nature of grammar. Language sciences 16.1:1-37.

Fox, Barbara A. 1995. The category 'S' in English conversation. In Werner Abraham, T. Givón, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Discourse grammar and typology, 153-178. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Fox, Barbara A. 2000. Micro-syntax in conversation. Paper presented at Interactional Linguistics Conference, Spa.

Fox, Barbara A. 2001. On the embodied nature of grammar: embodied being-in-the-world. In Joan Bybee and Michael Noonan, eds., Complex sentences in grammar and discourse, 79-100. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Fox, Barbara A. 2001. An exploration of prosody and turn projection in English conversation. In Selting, Margret and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics, 287-215. John Benjamins. Amsterdam.

Fox, Barbara A. 2001. Evidentiality: authority, responsibility and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11: 167-192.

Fox, Barbara A. 2007. Principles shaping grammatical practices: an exploration. Discourse Studies 9: 299-318.

Fox, Barbara A., Makoto Hayashi, and Robert Jasperson. 1996. A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and grammar, 185-237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fox, Barbara A. and Robert Jasperson. 1995. The syntactic organization of repair. In Philip Davis, ed., Descriptive and theoretical modes in the new linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Fox, Barbara A. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1990. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66:297-316.

Fox, Barbara A. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1990. On formulating reference: an interactional approach to relative clauses in English conversation. Papers in pragmatics 4:183-195.

Fox, Barbara A. and Sandra A. Thompson. 2007. Relative clauses in English conversation: relativizers, frequency and the notion of construction. Studies in Language 31.2: 293-326.

Fox Tree, Jean E. and Herbert H. Clark. 1997. Pronouncing "the" as "thee" to signal problems in speaking. Cognition 62: 141-167.

Fox Tree, Jean E. and Josef C. Schrock. 2002. Basic meanings of you know and I mean. Journal of pragmatics 34:727-747.

Franck, Dorothea. 1985. Sentences in conversational turns: A case of syntactic 'double bind' In M. Dacsal, ed., Dialogue, 233-245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Freed, Alice. The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation. Journal of pragmatics 21:621-644.

French, P. and John Local. 1983. Turn-competitive incomings. Journal of pragmatics 7: 701-715.

Fries, Charles C. 1952. The structure of English: an introduction to the construction of English sentences. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

Fry, J. 2003. Ellipsis and wa-marking in Japanese conversation. New York: Routledge.

Fujii, Noriko and Tsuyoshi Ono. 2000. The occurrence and non-occurrence of the Japanese direct object marker o in conversation. Studies in language 24.1: 1-39.

García-Miguel, José M. To appear. Clause structure and transitivity. In Geeraerts, Dirk and Hubert Cuykens, eds., Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics
29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gardner, Rod. 2002. When Listeners Talk: Response tokens and listener stance. John Benjamins.

Geluykens, Ronald. 1987. Tails (right-dislocations) as a repair mechanism in English conversation. In J. Nuyts and G. De Schutter, eds., Getting one's words into line: on word order and functional grammar, 119-129. Dordrecht: Foris.

Geluykens, Ronald. 1988. The interactional nature of referent-introduction. Chicago Linguistic Society 24.1: 141-154. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Geluykens, Ronald. 1988. Five types of clefting in English discourse. Linguistics 26: 823-841.

Geluykens, Ronald. 1989. Referent-tracking and cooperation in conversation: evidence from repair. Chicago Linguistic Society 25.2: 65-76. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Geluykens, Ronald. 1991. Information flow in English conversation: a new approach to the given-new distinction, 141-167. In Eija Ventola, ed., Functional and systemic linguistics: approaches and uses. Berlin: Mouton.

Geluykens, Ronald. 1991. Discourse functions of IT-clefts in English conversation. Communication and cognition 24: 343-358.

Geluykens, Ronald. 1992. From discourse process to grammatical construction: on left dislocation in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Geluykens, Ronald. 1993. Topic-introduction in English conversation. Transactions of the Philological Society 91: 709-730.

Geluykens, Ronald. 1994. The pragmatics of discourse anaphora in English: evidence from conversational repair. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Gohl, Christine. 2000. Causal relations in spoken discourse: asyndetic constructions as a means for giving reasons. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and B. Kortmann, eds., Cause, condition, concessions, contrast: cognitive and discourse perspectives, 83-110. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Golato, Andrea. 2000. An innovative German quotative for reporting on embodied action: und ich so/und er so 'and I'm like/and he's like'. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 29-54.

Golato, Andrea. 2002. German compliment responses. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 547-471.

Golato, Andrea. 2002. Grammar and interaction: reported discourse and subjunctive in German. Zeitschrift fur Sprachwissenschaft 22.1: 24-55.

Golato, Andrea. 2002. Self-quotation in German: reporting on past decisions. In T. Guldemann and M. v. Roncador, eds., Reported discourse: a meeting ground for different linguistic domains, 49-70. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Golato, Andrea. 2005. Compliments and compliment responses: their grammatical structure and sequential organization. Benjamins.

Gomez de Garcia, Jule. 1994. Communicative strategies in conversational Kickapoo. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado.

Goodwin, Charles. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In George Psathas, ed., Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology, 97-121. New York: Irvington.

Goodwin, Charles. 1980. Restarts, pauses and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn beginning. Sociological Inquiry 50:272-302.

Goodwin, Charles. 1981. Conversational organization: interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.[available at http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/clic/cgoodwin/publish.htm]

Goodwin, Charles. 1984. Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In Atkinson, Max and John Heritage. Structures of Social Action, 225-46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, Charles. 1986. Between and within: alternative treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies 9:205-217.

Goodwin, Charles. 1986. Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text 6.3:283-316.

Goodwin, Charles. 1989. Turn construction and conversational organization. In Brenda Dervin, Lawrence Grossberg,, Barbara J. O'Keefe, and Ellen Wartella, eds., Rethinking communication, vol. 2: Paradigm exemplars, 88-101. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Goodwin, Charles. 1995. Sentence construction within interaction. In Uta M. Quasthoff, ed., Aspects of oral communication, 198-219. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Goodwin, Charles. 1996. Transparent Vision. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and grammar, 370-404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, Charles. 2000. Action and embodiment in human interaction. Journal of pragmatics 32: 1489-1522.

Goodwin, Charles. 2002. Time in action. Current Anthropology 43 (Supplement August - October 2002 - Special issue "Repertoires of Timekeeping in Anthropology): S-19-S35.

Goodwin, Charles. 2003. Pointing as situated practice. In Sotaro Kita, ed., Pointing: where language, culture and cognition meet, 217-41. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1986. Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica 62.1/2: 51-75.

Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1987. Concurrent operations on talk: notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1.1:1-54.

Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1992. Assessments and the construction of context. In Charles Goodwin and Alessandro Duranti, eds., Rethinking context, 147-189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1992. Context, activity and participation. In Peter Auer and Aldo di Luzo, eds., The contextualization of language, 77-99. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1980. Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry 50: 303-317.

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1990. He-said-she-said: talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2006. The Hidden life of girls: games of stance, status, and exclusion. Oxford: Blackwell.

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2006. Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text and talk 26: 4/5: 513-542.

Goodwin, Marjorie H. and Charles Goodwin. 2000. Emotion within situated activity. In Duranti, Alessandro, ed. Linguistic anthropology: a reader: 239-257. Malden, MA: Oxford, Blackwell (originally published in Budwig, Nancy, Ina C. Uzgris and James V. Wertsch, eds. 2000. Communication: an arena of development, 33-54. Stamford CT: Ablex).

Greenbaum, Sidney. 1979. The treatment of clause and sentence in A grammar of contemporary English. In Greenbaum, Sidney, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik, eds., Studies in English linguistics, 17-29.

Greenbaum, Sidney and Gerald Nelson. 1999. Elliptical clauses in spoken and written English. In Peter Collins and David Lee, eds., The clause in English: in honour of Rodney Huddleston. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Gregory, Michelle L. and Laura A. Michaelis. 2001. Topicalization and left-dislocation: a functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33.11: 1665-1706.

Gundel, Jeanette K. Nancy Hedburg, and Ron Zacharski. 2005. Pronouns without explicit antecedents: how do we know when a pronoun is referential? In Branco, Antonio, Tony McEnery, and Ruslan Mitkov, eds., Anaphora Processing: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Modelling, 351-364. Amsterdam: Benjamins. http://www.zacharski.org/papers/GHZ2005.pdf

Günthner, Susanne. 1993. '... weil -- mann kann es ja wissenschaftlich untersuchen': Diskurs-pragmatische Aspekte der Wortstellung in weil-Sätzen. Linguistische Berichte 143: 37-59.

Günthner, Susanne. 1996. From subordination to coordination? Verb-second position in German causal and concessive constructions. Pragmatics 6.3: 323-356.

Günthner, Susanne. 1996. The prosodic contextualization of moral work: an analysis of reproaches in 'why'-formats. In Couper-Kuhlen and Selting, Prosody in conversation, 271-302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Günthner, Susanne. 1999. Polyphony and the 'layering of voices' in reported dialogues. Journal of pragmatics 31.5: 685-708.

Günthner, Susanne. 1999. ‘Wenn-Sätze im Vor-Vorfeld: Ihre Formen und Funktionen in der gesprochenen Sprache.’ InLiSt 11.

Günthner, Susanne. 2000. From concessive connector to discourse marker: the use of obwohl in everyday German interaction. In Kortmann, Bernd and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Cause - condition - concession - contrast, 439-468. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Günthner, Susanne 2006. ‘‘Was ihn trieb, war vor allem Wanderlust’ (Hesse: Narziss und Goldmund): Pseudocleft-Konstruktionen im Deutschen.’ In Susanne Günthner and Wolfgang Imo, eds., Konstruktionen in der Interaktion. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Hacohen, Gonen and Emmanuel A. Schegloff. 2006. On the preference for minimization in referring to persons: evidence from Hebrew conversation. Journal of Pragmatics

Hakulinen, Auli, 1987b: Avoiding personal reference in Finnish. In: Jef Verschueren & Maria Bertucelli-Papi (eds.), The pragmatic perspective. Selected papers from the 1985 International pragmatics conference. John Benjamins. Amsterdam, 140-153.

Hakulinen, Auli, 1993a: The grammar of opening routines. In: SKY 1993. Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland 15. Helsinki, 149-170.

Hakulinen, Auli. 2001. Minimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questions. Pragmatics 11.1: 1-15.

Hakulinen, Auli, 1998: The use of Finnish nyt as a discourse particle. In: Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds.), Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory, 83-96. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Hakulinen, Auli, 2001. On some uses of the discourse particle kyllä in Finnish conversations. In: Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret Selting, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. .

Hakulinen, Auli, to appear. Types of conversation. In: J.-O. Östman, J. Verschueren & J. Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Hakulinen, Auli and Margret Selting, eds. 2005. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Hanks, William. 1990. Referential practice: language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Hanks, William. 1992. The indexical ground of deictic reference, in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin, eds., Rethinking context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hardy, Donald E. and Amy Leuchtmann. 1996. Topic vs. cohesion in the prediction of causal ordering in English conversation. Discourse Processes 21.2: 237-254.

Hayashi, Makoto. 1994. A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japanese conversation. In Noriko Akatsuka, ed., Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 1V: 77-93. Stanford: CSLI.

Hayashi, Makoto. 1997. An exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle in Japanese spoken discourse. In Sohn, Ho-min and John Haig, eds., Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 6. Stanford: CSLI.

Hayashi, Makoto. 1999. Where grammar and interaction meet: a study of co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Human Studies 22: 475-499.

Hayashi, Makoto. 2001. Postposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation: an interactional account of a grammatical practice. In Margret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Hayashi, Makoto. 2003. Joint utterance construction in Japanese conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Hayashi, Makoto. 2003. Language and the body as resources for collaborative action: a study of word searches in Japanese conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36.2: 109-141.

Hayashi, Makoto. 2004. Projection and grammar: notes on the 'action-projecting' use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of pragmatics 36.8: 1337-1374.

Hayashi, M. 2005. Referential problems and turn construction: An exploration of an intersection between grammar and interaction. Text 25.4: 437-468.

Hayashi, Makoto and Junko Mori. 1998. Co-construction in Japanese revisited: we do 'finish each other's sentences'. In Akatsuka, Noriko, Hajime Hoji, Shoichi Iwasaki, Sung-Ock Sohn, and Susan Strauss, eds., Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 7, 77-93. Stanford: CSLI.

Hayashi, Makoto and Kyung-eun Yoon. 2006. A cross-linguistic exploration of demonstratives in interaction: with particular reference to the context of word-formulation trouble. Studies in Language 30.3: 485-540.

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa, 1996: A discourse perspective on the grammaticization of the partitive case in Finnish. In: Timo Haukioja, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Elise Kärkkäinen (eds.), SKY 1996. Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland 18, 7-35. Helsinki.

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa, 1997. Functions of case-marking vs. non-marking in conversational Finnish. In: Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Kristin Davidse & Dirk Noël, eds., Reconnecting language: Morphology and syntax in functional perspectives. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory.) John Benjamins. Amsterdam.

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2001. Syntax in the making: the emergence of syntactic units in Finnish conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2001: Emerging syntax for interaction: Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interaction. In Selting, Margret and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics, 25-50. John Benjamins. Amsterdam.

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2003. Argument splits in Finnish grammar and discourse. In: John W. Du Bois, Lorraine E. Kumpf & William J. Ashby, eds., Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 247-272. John Benjamins. Amsterdam.

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2004. Shared syntax: the grammar of co-construction. Journal of pragmatics 36.8: 1315-1336.

Heritage, John. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, eds., Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis, 299-345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heritage, John. 1988. Explanations as accounts: a conversation analytic perspective. In Antaki, Charles, ed., Analyzing lay explanations: a case book of methods, 127-144. London: Sage.

Heritage, John. 1998. Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society 27: 291-334.

Heritage, John. 2002. The limits of questioning: negative interrogatives and hostile question content. JoP 34: 1427-1446.

Heritage, John. To appear. Intersubjectivity and Progressivity in References to Persons (and Places). In Tanya Stivers and N.J. Enfield (eds.), Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. The Terms of Agreement:
Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction. Social
Psychology Quarterly 68:15-38.

Heritage, John C. and Andrew L. Roth. 1995. Grammar and institution: questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on language and social interaction 28.1: 1-60.

Heritage, John and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 1994. Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: and-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society 23: 1-29.

Hopper, Paul. 1987. Emergent grammar. BLS 13, 139-157.

Hopper, Paul, J. 1988. Emergent grammar and the A Priori Grammar constraint. In Deborah Tannen, ed., Linguistics in context: connecting observation and understanding, 117-134. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Hopper, Paul J. 1990. The emergence of the category 'proper name' in discourse. In H. Davis and T. Taylor, eds., Redefining linguistics, 149-162. London: Routledge.

Hopper, Paul J. 1992. Times of the sign: on temporality in recent linguistics. Time and society 1 (2): 223-238.

Hopper, Paul J. 1995. The category 'event' in natural discourse and logic. In Werner Abraham, T. Givon, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Discourse grammar and typology, 139-150.

Hopper, Paul. 1997. Discourse and the category 'verb' in English. Language and communication 17.2: 93-102.

Hopper, Paul, J. 1998. Emergent grammar. In Michael Tomasello, ed., The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 155-175. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hopper, Paul. 2000. Grammatical Constructions and their Discourse Origins: Prototype or Family Resemblance? In Martin Pütz and Susanne Niemeier, eds., Applied Cognitive Linguistics: Theory, Acquisition and Language Pedagogy. Berlin: Mouton/de Gruyter. ['pseudoclefts']

Hopper, Paul. 2001. Hendiadys and auxiliation in English. In Joan Bybee and Michael Noonan, eds., Complex sentences in grammar and discourse, 145-174. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Hopper, Paul. 2004. The openness of grammatical constructions. Chicago Linguistic Society 40, 239-256. ['pseudoclefts' and hendiadys]

Hopper, Paul J., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar, Language 60.4: 703-752.

Hopper, Paul and Sandra A. Thompson. To appear. Projectability and clause combining in interaction. In Laury, Ritva, ed., Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: the multifunctionality of conjunctions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Huang, Shuanfan. 1999. The emergence of a grammatical category definite article in spoken Chinese. Journal of pragmatics 31.1: 77-94.

Huang, Shuanfan. 1998. Emergent lexical semantics. In Shuanfan Huang, ed. Selected Papers from the Second International Symposium on Languages in Taiwan, 129-150.

Huang, Shuanfan. 2003. Doubts about complementation: a Functionalist Analysis. Language and Linguistics 4.2:429-455.

Imo, Wolfgang . 2005. A construction grammar approach to the phrase “I mean” in spoken English. InLiSt 42.

Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1993. The structure of the intonation unit in Japanese. In Soonja Choi, ed., Japanese and Korean linguistics, Vol. III, 39-53. Stanford: Center for the study of language and information.

Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1995. The Northridge earthquake conversation: The floor structure and the "loop" sequence in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 661-693.

Iwasaki, Shoichi and Tsuyoshi Ono. 2001. "Sentence" in spontaneous spoken Japanese discourse. In Joan Bybee and Michael Noonan, eds., Complex sentences in grammar and discourse, 175-202. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Iwasaki, Shoichi and Hongyin Tao. 1993. A comparative study of the structure of the intonation unit in English, Japanese, and Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, January, 1993.

Jacoby, Sally and Elinor Ochs, eds. 1995. Co-construction. Special issue of Research on Language and Social Interaction 28.3.

Jefferson, Gail. 1973. A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica 9:47-96.

Jefferson, Gail. 1983. Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In V. d'Urso and P. Leonardi, eds., Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric, 11-38. Padua: Cleup.

Jefferson, Gail. 1990. List construction as a task and interactional resource. In G. Psathas, ed., Interactional competence, 63-92. Washington: University Press of America.

Jucker, Andreas H. and Yael Ziv, eds. 1998. Discourse markers: descriptions and theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Jurafsky, Daniel, Alan Bell, Michelle Gregory, and William D. Raymond. 2001. Probabilistic relations between words: evidence from reduction in lexical production. In Bybee, Joan L. and Paul J. Hopper, eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Kärkkäinen, Elise. 1996. Preferred argument structure and subject role in American English conversational discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 675-701.

Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2004. Epistemic stance in English conversation: a description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Kärkkäinen, Elise, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, and Marja-Liisa Helasvuo. 2007. Discourse structure. In Timothy Shopen, ed., Language typology and syntactic description, 301-371. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Keenan, Elinor Ochs and Bambi Schieffelin. 1976a. Foregrounding referents: a reconsideration of left dislocation in discourse. Berkeley Linguistics Society 2:240-257. [reprinted in Ochs and Scheiffelin, eds., 1983, Acquiring conversational competence, 158-174. London: Routledge.]

Keenan, Elinor Ochs and Bambi Schieffelin. 1976b. Topic as a discourse notion: a study of topic in the conversation of children and adults. In Charles N. Li, ed., Subject and topic, 335-384. New York: Academic Press.

Keevallik, Leelo. 2003. Terminally rising pitch contours of response tokens in Estonian. Crossroads of Language, Interaction, and Culture 5: 49-65.

Keevallik, Leelo. 2003. From interaction to grammar: Estonian finite verb forms in conversation. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Uralica Upsaliensia 34. Uppsala University Library.

Kelly, Barbara F. 2003. The emergence of argument structure from gesture to speech. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Kim, Haeyeon. 1996. The structure of the intonation unit and verbal affixes in Korean conversation. Discourse and cognition 2: 47-74.

Kim, Haeyeon. 1997. Turn-taking and verbal affixes in Korean conversation. Language Research 33.4: 601-627.

Kim, Haeyeon. 1997. Referential choice for third persons in Korean conversation. Discourse and cognition 4.2: 121-158.

Kim, Haeyeon. 1999. The form and function of questions in Korean conversation. Discourse and cognition 6.2: 211-247.

Kim, Haeyeon. 2000. The form and function of declarative questions in Korean multi-party conversations. Discourse and cognition 7.1: 63-94.

Kim, Haeyeon. 2002. Collaborative turn completion in Korean conversation. Language Research 38.4: 1281-1316.

Kim, Haeyeon. 2002. The form and function of next-turn repetition in English conversation. Language Research 38.1: 51-81.

Kim, Haeyeon. 2002. Single-clause turns as turn-constructional units in Korean conversation. Discourse and cognition 9:12: 29-57.

Kim, Haeyeon. 2003. Functions of post-posed adverbial clauses in Korean conversation. Language Research 39.4: 911-932.

Kim, Haeyeon. 2003. The predicate mean in discourse and grammar. Discourse and cognition 10.3: 109-135.

Kim, Haeyeon. 2003. NP turn extensions in Korean conversation. Korean Journal of Linguistics 28.4: 585-605.

Kim, Haeyeon. 2003. Functions of single full NP turns with rising intonation in English conversation. Discourse and cognition 10.4: 49-77.

Kim, Haeyeon. 2004. Backchannels as achievements of social interaction in Korean conversation. The sociolinguistic journal of Korea 12.1: 65-93.

Kim, Haeyeon. 2004. Truncated intonation units in English conversation. Discourse and cognition 11.4:81-105.

Kim Kyu-hyun. 1992. WH-clefts and left dislocation in English conversation with reference to topicality in Korean. PhD dissertation, UCLA.

Kim Kyu-hyun. 1993. Topicality in Korean conversation: a conversation analytic perspective. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 2. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Kim Kyu-hyun. 1993. Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation as interactional resources. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 3. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1995. WH-clefs and left-dislocation in English conversation: cases of topicalization. In Downing, Pamela A. and Michael Noonan, eds., Word Order in Discourse, 247-. Benjamins.

Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1999. Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation: types and functions. Discourse and cognition 6.2: 141-168.

Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1999. Phrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences in Korean conversation. Human Studies 22: 425-446.

Kim, Kyu-hyun. 2001. Confirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaboration: organization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation. In Selting, Margret and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds. 2001. Studies in interactional linguistics, 345-372. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Kim, Kyu-hyun and Kyung-Hee Suh. 1994. The discourse connective nikka in Korean conversation. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 4, 113-129. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Kitano, Hiroaki. 1999. On interaction and grammar: evidence from one us of the Japanese demonstrative are 'that'. Pragmatics 9.3: 383-400.

Klein-Andreu, Flora. Conversational focus. 1989. Why speech seems ungrammatical. In Yoshai Tobin, ed., From sign to text: a semiotic view of communication, 25-44. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Klein-Andreu, Flora. Conversational focus. 1995. In Ellen Contini-Morava and Barbara Sussman Goldberg, eds., Meaning as explanation: advances in linguistic sign theory, 405-422. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Klewitz, Gabriele and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1999. Quote-unquote. The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Pragmatics. 9.4, 459-485.

Koshik, Irene. 2002. WH-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies 5.1: 51-77.

Koshik, Irene. 2002. A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics 34.12: 1851-1877.

Koshik, Irene. 2002. Designedly incomplete utterances: a pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on language and social interaction 5.3: 277-309.

Koshik, Irene. 2005. Beyond rhetorical questions: assertive questions in everyday interaction. Benjamins.

Krug, Manfred G. 1998. String frequency: a cognitive motivating factor in coalescence, language processing, and linguistic change. Journal of English Linguistics 26.4: 286-320.

Krug, Manfred G. 2001. Frequency, iconicity, categorization: evidence from emerging modals. In Bybee, Joan L. and Paul J. Hopper, eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 309-335. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Kumpf, Lorraine E. 2003. Genre and preferred argument structure: sources of argument structure in classroom discourse. In Du Bois, John W., Lorraine E. Kumpf, and William J. Ashby, eds. Preferred argument structure: grammar as architecture for function, 109-130. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Labov, William. 1972. The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In Language in the Inner City, 354-396. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Labov, William and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press.

Lambrecht, Knud. 1984. A pragmatic constraint on lexical subjects in spoken French. Papers from the 20th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 239-256. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Lambrecht, Knud. 1986. Pragmatically motivated syntax: presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. Papers from the parasession at the 21st regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 115-126. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Lambrecht, Knud. 1987. On the status of SVO sentences in French discourse. In Russell S. Tomlin, ed., Coherence and grounding in discourse, 217-261 Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Lambrecht, Knud. 1988. Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In John Haiman and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 135-179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lambrecht, Knud. 1988. There was a farmer had a dog: syntactic amalgams revisited. BLS 14: 319-339.

Laury, Ritva. 1996. Conversational use and basic meaning of Finnish demonstratives. In Adele Goldberg, ed., Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, 303-319. Center for the Study of Language and Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Laury, Ritva. 1996. Pronouns and adverbs, figure and ground: The local case forms and locative forms of the Finnish demonstratives in spoken discourse. In: Timo Haukioja, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Elise Kärkkäinen (eds.), SKY 1996. Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland 18. Helsinki, 65-92.

Laury, Ritva. 1997. Demonstratives in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lehmann, Hans Martin. 2002. Zero subject relative constructions in American and British English. In: New Frontiers of Corpus Research. ed. by Pam Peters. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 163-177.

Lenk, Uta. 1997. Marking discourse coherence: functions of discourse markers in English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

Lerner, Gene H. 1987. Collaborative turn sequences: sentence construction and social action. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine.

Lerner, Gene H. 1989. Notes on overlap management in conversation: the case of delayed completion. Western Journal of Speech Communication 53:167-177.

Lerner, Gene H. 1991. On the syntax of sentences in progress. Language in Society 20:441-458.

Lerner, Gene H. 1992. Assisted storytelling: deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative sociology 15: 247-271.

Lerner, Gene H. 1993. Collectivities in action: establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text 13: 213-245.

Lerner, Gene H. 1994. Responsive list construction: a conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13.1: 20-33.

Lerner, Gene H. 1996. Finding 'face' in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 59.4: 303-321.

Lerner, Gene H. 1996. On the 'semi-permeable' character of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and grammar, 238-271 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lerner, Gene H. 2002. Turn-sharing: the choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In Cecilia Ford, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., The language of turn and sequence, 225-256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lerner, Gene H. 2004. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: grammar as action in prompting a speaker to elaborate. ROLSI 37.2: 151-184.

Lerner, Gene H. and Tomoyo Takagi. 1999. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: a co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics 31.1: 49-75.

Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lindström, Jan. 2006. Grammar in the service of interaction: exploring turn organization in Swedish. Research on language and social interaction 39.1: 81-117.

Liddicoat, Anthony J. 2004. The projectability of turn constructional units and the role of prediction in listening. Discourse studies 6.4: 449-469.

Lin, Hsueh-o. 1996. Repair in Taiwanese conversation. Studies in English Literature and Linguistics 22: 89-113. Lindstr

Linell, Per. 1998. Approaching dialogue: talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Linell, Per. 2005. The written language bias in linguistics: its nature, origins, and transformation. Oxford: Routledge.

Lindström, Anna Karin. 1997. Designing social actions: grammar, prosody, and interaction in Swedish conversation. PhD dissertation, UCLA.

Linton, Larry D. 2001. Offering a candidate answer in entertainment interviews: a turn organizational practice employed for narrowing the scope of inquiry and producing entertainment. MA Thesis, UC Santa Barbara.

Liu, Mei-chun. 1993. Discourse, grammar, and grammaticalization: synchronic and diachronic analysis of Mandarin adverbial markers jiu and cai, PhD dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder.

Local, John. 1992. Continuing and restarting. In Auer, Peter and Aldo di Luzio, eds., The contextualization of language, 273-296. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Local, John and John Kelly. 1986. Projection and 'silences': notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies 9: 185-204.

Local, John, John Kelly, and Bill Wells. 1986. Towards a phonology of conversation: turn-taking in Tyneside English. Journal of linguistics 22.2: 411-437.

Local, John and Gareth Walker. 2004. Abrupt-joins as a resource for the production of multi-unit, multi-action turns. Journal of pragmatics 36.8: 1375-1404.

Local, John, Bill Wells, and M. Sebba. 1985. Phonology for conversation: phonetic aspects of turn delimitation in London Jamaican. Journal of pragmatics 9: 309-330.

Luke, Kang Kwong. 1990. Utterance particles in Cantonese conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Maschler, Yael. 1997. Discourse markers at frame shifts in Israeli Hebrew talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics 7.2: 183-211.

Maschler, Yael. 2002. The role of discourse markers in the construction of multivocality in Israeli Hebrew talk in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 35.1: 1-38.

Maschler, Yael.  2002. On the grammaticization of ke'ilu (‘like’, lit.
‘as if’) in Hebrew talk-in-interaction. Language in Society 31: 243-276.

Maschler, Yael.  2003.  The discourse marker nu:   Israeli Hebrew impatience in interaction.  Text 23:  89-128.

Matsuda, Kenjiro. 1995. Variable zero-marking of (o) in Tokyo Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.

Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1995. Fragmentation in Conversational Japanese: A Case Study Japan Association for Language Teaching 17.2: 238-254.

Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1996. Intonation units in conversational Japanese: structure and linkage. PhD disseration, University of California, Los Angeles.

Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1997. NPs in Japanese conversation. Pragmatics 7.2: 163- 181.

Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1998. Detached NPs in Japanese conversation: types and functions. Text 18.3: 417-444.

Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1999. And-prefaced questions in institutional discourse. Linguistics 37.2: 251-274. (English data)

Matsumoto, Kazuko. 2000. Japanese intonation units and syntactic structure.
Studies. in Language 24.515-64.

Matsumoto, Kazuko. 2003. Intonation Units in Japanese Conversation: Syntactic, informational and functional structures. Amsterdam: Benjamins. .

Matthiessen, Christian M I M. 2001. Combining clauses into clause complexes: a multi-faceted view. In Bybee, Joan and Michael Noonan, eds., Complex sentences in grammar and discourse, 235-320. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Mayes, Patricia. 1990. Quotations in spoken English. Studies in language 14.2: 325-363.

Mayes, Patricia. 2003. Language, social structure, and culture: a genre analysis of cooking classes in Japan and America. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Mayes, Patricia and Tsuyoshi Ono. 1991. Social factors influencing reference in Japanese: with a special emphasis on ano hito. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 3:84-93.

Maynard, S. K. 1989. Japanese conversation: self-contextualization through structure and interactional management. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Mazeland, Harrie. 1996. Pragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in Wh-questions. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 10: 185-206.

Mazeland, Harrie. 2007. Parenthetical sequences. Journal of Pragmatics 39.10: 1816-1869.

Mazeland, Harrie and Mike Huiskes. 2001. Dutch but as a sequential conjunction: Its use as a resumptive marker. In Margret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics, 141-169. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Merritt, Marilyn. 1976. On questions following questions in service encounters. Language in Society 5: 315-357.

Miller, Jim. 1995. Does spoken language have sentences? In Palmer, F.R., ed., Grammar and meaning: essays in honor of Sir John Lyons, 116-135. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Miller, Jim and Weinert, Regina. 1995. The functions of likein dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 23: 365-393.

Miller, Jim and Weinert, Regina. 1998. Spontaneous spoken language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mondada, Lorenza. 1998. Pour une linguistique interactionelle. Acta Romanica Balisiensia 8: 115-128.

Mondada, Lorenza. 2000. Analyze conversationelle et "grammaire-pour-l'interaction". In A.C. Berthoud and L. Mondada, eds., Modèles du discours en confrontation. Bern: Lang.

Mori, Junko. 1994. Functions of the connective datte in Japanese conversation. Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 4, 147-163, edited by N. Akatsuka.

Mori, Junko. 1999. Well I may be exaggerating but ...: self-qualifying clauses in negotiating of opinions among Japanese speakers. Human Studies 22: 447-473.

Mori, Junko. 1999. Negotiating agreement and disagreement in Japanese: connective expressions and turn construction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Mori, Junko and Kanae Nakamura. 2008. Negotiating agreement and disagreement in Japanese: An analysis of designedly ambiguous turn completion points. In Mori, Junko and Amy Snyder Ohta, eds., Japanese applied linguistics: discourse and social perspectives. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Morita, Emi. 2002. Stance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences: final particles as epistemic markers in Japanese. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 10, 220-233, edited by N. Akatsuka and Susan Strauss. Stanford: CSLI.

Morita, Emi. 2005. Negotiation of contingent talk: the Japanese interactional particles ne and sa. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Morita, Emi. To appear. Children's use of address and reference terms: language socialization in a Japanese-English bilingual environment. Multilingua.

Mulder, Jean and Sandra A. Thompson. 2006. The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Keith Allan, ed., Selected papers from the 2005 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society 1-18. http://www.als.asn.au.

Mulder, Jean and Sandra A. Thompson. To appear. The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Laury, Ritva, ed., Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: the multifunctionality of conjunctions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Mulder, Jean, Sandra A. Thompson, and Cara Penry Williams. To appear. Final but in Australian English Conversation. In Peters, Pamela.

Murphy, Keith M. 2003. Building meaning in interaction: rethinking gesture classification. Crossroads of Language, Interaction, and Culture 5: 29-47.

Nakayama, Toshihide and Kumiko Ichihashi-Nakayama. Japanese keto: Discourse genre and grammaticization. In Sohn, Ho-min and John Haig, eds. Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 6: 607-618. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Nariyama, S. 2000. Referent identification for ellipted arguments in Japanese. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Melbourne.

Naro, Anthony J. and Sebastião J. Votre. 1999. Discourse motivations for linguistic regularities: verb/subject order in spoken Brazilian Portuguese. Probus 11: 75-100.

Nicita, Linda. 2002. Cognitive verbs in Spanish. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado.

Ochs, Elinor. 1979. Social foundations of language. in Freedle, R., ed., New directions in discourse processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Ochs, Elinor. 1982. Ergativity and word order in Samoan child language: a sociolinguistic study. Language 58:646-71.

Ochs, Elinor. 1983. Planned and unplanned discourse. In Ochs, Elinor and Bambi Schieffelin, eds., Acquiring conversational competence, 129-157. London: Routledge.

Ochs, Elinor. 1986. From feelings to grammar: a Samoan case study. In B. B. Schieffelin and E. Ochs, eds., Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ochs, Elinor. 1988. Culture and language development: language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ochs, Elinor, Patrick Gonzales, and Sally Jacoby. 1996. When I come down I'm in the domain state. In Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 1996. Interaction and grammar, 328-369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ochs, Elinor and Bambi Schieffelin. 1983. Topic as a discourse notion. In Ochs, Elinor and Bambi Schieffelin, eds., Acquiring conversational competence, 158-174. London: Routledge.

Ochs, Elinor, Bambi Schieffelin, and Martha Platt. 1979. Propositions across utterances and speakers. In Elinor Ochs and Bambi Schieffelin, eds., Developmental pragmatics, 251-268. New York: Academic Press.

Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 1996. Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Reviewed by Don H. Zimmerman, Language in Society 29:409-412 September 2000.]

Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. Introduction. Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

O'Connor, Mary Catherine. 1990. Third-person reference in Northern Pomo conversation: the indexing of discourse genre and social relations. IJAL 56.3: 377-409.

O'Dowd, Elizabeth M. 1998. Prepositions and particles in English: a discourse-functional account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ogden, Richard A. 2006. Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1752–1775.

Oh, Sun-Young. 2005. English zero anaphora as an interactional resource. Research on language and social interaction 38.3: 267-302.

Oh, Sun-Young. 2006. English zero anaphora as an interactional resource II. Discourse studies 8.6: 817-846.

Ohori, Toshio. 1997. Framing effects in Japanese non-final clauses: toward an optimal grammar-pragmatics interface. BLS 23: 471-480.

Okamoto, Shigeko. 1995. Pragmaticization of meaning in some sentence-final particles. In Shibatani, Masayoshi and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Essays in semantics and pragmatics, 219-246. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Ono, Tsuyoshi and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, eds. To appear. Turn ontinuation in cross-linguistic perspective. Special issue of Pragmatics.

Ono, Tsuyoshi and Ryoko Suzuki. 1992. Word order variability in Japanese conversation: motivations and grammaticization. Text 12:429-445.

Ono, Tsuyoshi and Sandra A. Thompson. 1994. Unattached NPs in English conversation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 20: 402-419.

Ono, Tsuyoshi and Sandra A. Thompson. 1995. What can conversation tell us about syntax? In Philip W. Davis, ed., Descriptive and Theoretical Modes in the Alternative Linguistics, 213-271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ono, Tsuyoshi and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. Interaction and syntax in the structure of conversational discourse. In Eduard Hovy and Donia Scott, eds., Discourse Processing: an interdicsiplinary perspective, 67-96. Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag.

Ono, Tsuyoshi and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. The dynamic nature of conceptual structure building: evidence from conversation, in Adele Goldberg, ed., Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, 391-399. Chicago: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Ono, Tsuyoshi and Sandra A. Thompson. 1997. Deconstructing 'zero anaphora'. BLS 23: 481-491.

Ono, Tsuyoshi and Sandra A. Thompson. 2003. Japanese (w)atashi/ore/boku: they're not just pronouns. Cognitive Linguistics 14.4: 321-347.

Ono, Tsuyoshi and Sandra A. Thompson. To appear. Fixedness in Japanese adjectives in conversation: Toward a new understanding of a lexical (part-of-speech) category. In Corrigan, Roberta, Edith Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali, and Kathleen Wheatley, eds., Formulaic Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Ono, Tsuyoshi, Sandra A. Thompson, and Ryoko Suzuki. 2000. The pragmatic nature of the so-called subject marker ga in Japanese: evidence from conversation. Discourse Studies 2.1: 55-84.

Ono, Tsuyoshi and Eri Yoshida. 1996. A study of co-constructions in Japanese: we don't 'finish each other's sentences'. In Noriko Akatsuka, Shoichi Iwasaki, and Susan Strauss, eds., Japanese/Korean Linguistics 5, 115-129. Stanford: CSLI.

Oreström, Bengt. 1983. Turn-taking in English conversation. (Lund Studies in English 66.) Lund: CWK Gleerup.

Östman, Jan-Ola. 1981. You know: a discourse-functional approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Park, Joseph Sung-Yul. 2002. Cognitive and interactional motivations for the intonation unit. Studies in Language 26.3: 637-680.

Park, Yong-Yae. 1996. The Korean connective nuntey in conversational discourse. In Noriko Akatsuka, Shoichi Iwasaki, and Susan Strauss, eds., Japanese/Korean Linguistics 5, 131-147. Stanford: CSLI.

Park, Yong-Yae. 1997. A cross-linguistic study of the use of contrastive connectives in English, Korean, and Japanese conversation. UCLA PhD dissertation.

Park, Yong-Yae. 1998. Interactive grammar: the turn-final use of nuntey in Korean and kedo in Japanese. In Silva, David James, ed., Japanese/Korean Linguistics 8, 45-59. Stanford: CSLI.

Park, Yong-Yae. 1999. The Korean Connective -nuntey in Conversational Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 31, 191-218.

Pawley, Andrew and Frances H. Syder. 1983. Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 7:551-579.

Pawley, Andrew and Frances H. Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack C. Richards and Richard W. Schmidt, eds., Language and communication, 191-268. London: Longman.

Pawley, Andrew and Frances H. Syder. 2000. The one clause at a time hypothesis. In Heidi Riggenbach, ed., Perspectives on fluency, 163-199. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2001. Dislocation à gauche et organisation interactionnelle. Marges Linguistiques vol. 2, 177-194.

Pomerantz, A. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features found in preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage eds., Structures of Social Action, 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pomerantz, Anita M. 1986 Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims, Human Studies 9: 219-30.

Pomerantz, Anita. 1988. Offering a candidate answer: an information seeking strategy, Communication Monograph 55, 360-373.

Raymond, Geoffrey. 2000. The structure of responding: type-conforming and nonconforming responses to yes/no type interrogatives. UCLA PhD dissertation.

Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 68: 939-967.

Raymond, Geoffrey. 2004. Prompting Action: The stand-alone "so" in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37.2: 185-218.

Raymond, Geoffrey. 2006. Grammar and social organization: Yes/no type interrogatives and the structure of responding. Drew, Paul and John Heritage, eds., Conversation Analysis, London: Sage. [Reprint of Raymond (2003)]

Romaine, Suzanne and Deborah Lange. 1991. The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: a case of grammaticalization in progress. American speech 66.3: 227-279.

de Ruiter, J. P., Holger Mitterer, and N. J. Enfield. 2006. Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language 82.3: 515-536.

Sacks, H. 1987. On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button and J.R.E.Lee, eds., Talk and Social Organization, 54-69. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.

Harvey Sacks. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sacks, Harvey and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In George Psathas, ed., Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology, 15-21. Irvington.

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50.4:696-735.

Sadler, Misumi. 2007. Grammar in use across time and space: deconstructing the Japanese 'dative subject' construction. Benjamins.

Saft, Scott. 2002. Review of Mori 1999 and Tanaka 1999. Discourse studies 4.1: 120-126.

Sankoff, Gillian and Penelope Brown. 1976. The origins of syntax in discouse. Language 52:651-666.

Sanchez, Ivo. 2001. Prosodic integration in Spanish complement constructions. In Alan Cienki, Barbara J. Luka, and Michael B. Smith, eds., Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure, 201-214. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Sanchez-Ayala, Ivo. Under review. The Spanish Presentative Lexicon. Studies in language.

Sanchez-Ayala, Ivo. 2003. Constructions as resources for interactions: lists in Spanish and English conversation. Discourse studies 5.3:323-349..

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1972. Notes on conversational practice: formulating place. In D. Sudnow, ed., Studies in social interaction, 75-119. Free Press.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1979. The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In Talmy Givón, ed., Discourse and syntax, 261-286. New York: Academic Press.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1980. Preliminaries to Preliminaries: 'Can I ask you a question'. Sociological Inquiry 50. 3-4: 104-152.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1982. Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of 'uh huh' and other things that come between sentences. In Tannen, Deborah, ed. Analyzing discourse: text and talk, 71-93. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1984. On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson anad J. Heritage, eds., Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis, 28-52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1987. Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics 25: 201-218.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1987. Recycled turn beginnings: a precise repair mechanism in conversation's turn-taking organisation. In Graham Button and John R. Lee, eds., Talk and social organisation, 70-85. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1988. Discourse as an interactional achievement II: an exercise in conversation analysis. In Deborah Tannen, ed., Linguistics in context: connecting observation and understanding, 135-158. (Advances in Discourse Processes XXIX.) Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1989. Reflections on language, development, and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In M. H. Bornstein and J. S. Bruner (eds.), Interaction in Human Development, 139-153. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1990. On the organization of sequences as a source of 'coherence' in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval, ed., Conversational organization and its development, 51-77. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1991. Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In Resnick, Lauren, John Levine, and Stephanie Teasley, eds., Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 150-171. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1995. Discourse as an interactional achievement III: the omnirelevance of action. Research on language and social interaction 28.3: 185-211.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: one direction for inquiry into grammar and interaction. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and grammar, 52-133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: a partial sketch of a systematics. In Barbara A. Fox, ed., Studies in anaphora, 437-485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Confirming allusions: toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology 102.1: 161-216.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Issues of relevance for discourse analysis: contingency in action, interaction, and co-participation context. In Eduard Hovy and Donia Scott, eds., Discourse Processing: an interdicsiplinary perspective, 3-35. Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. Third turn repair. In Gregory Guy, Crawford Feagin, Deborah Schiffrin, and John Baugh, eds. Towards a social science of language: papers in honor of William Labov, Vol. II, 31-40. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. Practices and actions: boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes 23: 499-545.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1998. Body Torque. Social Research 65.3: 535-595.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2001. Conversation analysis: a project in process - increments. Forum Lecture, LSA Linguistics Institute, UC Santa Barbara.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2001. Overwrought utterances: "complex sentences" in a different sense. In Joan Bybee and Michael Noonan, eds., Complex sentences in grammar and discourse, 321-336. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53:361-382.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Harvey Sacks. 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica 8: 289-327.

Scheibman, Joanne. 2000. I dunno... a usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don't in American English conversation. Journal of pragmatics 32: 105-124.

Scheibman, Joanne. 2001. Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation. In Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper Eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 61-89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Scheibman, Joanne. 2002. Point of view and grammar: Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Scheibman, Joanne. 2003. Inclusive and exclusive patterning of the English first person plural: evidence from conversation. In Michel Achard and Suzanne Kemmer, eds., Language, culture and mind. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Scheutz, Hannes. 2001. On clausal clause combining: the case of weil in spoken German. In Selting/Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics, 111-139.

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1985. Multiple constraints on discourse options: a quantitative analysis of causal sequences. Discourse processes 8: 281-303.

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1986. The functions of and in discourse. Journal of pragmatics 10.1: 41-66.

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1990. Between text and context: deixis, anaphora and the meaning of then. Text 10.3: 245-270.

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1992. Conditionals as topics in discourse. Linguistics 30.1: 165-197.

Schuetze, Hannes. 2001. On causal clause combining: the case of weil in spoken German. In Selting, Margret and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics, 111-139. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan. 1984. On the borders of subordination: signaling relative clauses in spoken German. BLS 10: 650-659.

Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, 1994, Prosody, syntax, and discourse pragmatics: assessing information flow in German conversation, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Marian Shapley, and Elizabeth G. Weber. 1992. Units of intonation in discourse: acoustic and auditory analyses in contrast. Language and Speech 34:207-234.

Schulze-Wenck. 2005. Form and function of ‘first verbs’ in talk-in-interaction. In Hakulinin, Auli and Margret Selting, eds., Syntax and lexis in conversation, 319-348. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Scollon, Ron. 1976. Conversations with a one-year-old: a case study of the developmental foundation of syntax. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Scollon, Ron. 1979. A real early stage: an unzippered condensation of a dissertation on child language. In Elinor Ochs, Bambi Scheffelin, eds., Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.

Scollon, Ron. 2001. Mediated discourse: the nexus of practice. London: Routledge.

Szczepek Reed, Beatrice. 2006. Prosodic orientation in English conversation. Houndmills, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Selting, Margret. 1988. The role of intonation in the organization of repair and problem handling sequences in conversation. Journal of pragmatics 12: 293-322.

Selting, Margret. 1992. Prosody in conversational questions. Journal of pragmatics 17: 315-245.

Selting, Margret. 1996. On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics 6.3: 371-388.

Selting, Margret. 1996. Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: the case of so-called 'astonished' questions in repair initiation. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, eds., Prosody and conversation, 231-270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Selting, Margret. 1997. So-called ellipses as interactively relevant constructions? A new attempt over the range and borders of the ellipse term for the analysis of spoken language in interactions. In: Peter Schlobinski, ed., Syntax of spoken German, 117 156. Opladen: West German publishing house.

Selting, Margret. 1998. TCUs and TRPs: the construction of units in conversational talk. Konstanz: InLiSt 4.

Selting, Margret. 1998. Fragments of TCUs as deviant cases of TCU-production in conversational talk. Konstanz: InLiSt 9.

Selting, Margret. 2000. The constructing of units in conversational talk. Language in society: 477-517.

Selting, Margret. 2001. Fragments of units as deviant cases of unit production in conversational talk. In Margret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds. Studies in interactional linguistics, 229-258. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, et al. 1998. Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem (GAT). Linguistische Berichte173: 91-122.

Selting, Margret and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds. 2001. Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Seppänen, Eeva-Leena, 1996: Ways of referring to a knowing co-participant in Finnish conversation. In: Timo Haukioja, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Elisa Kärkkäinen (eds.), SKY 1996. Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland, 135-176. Helsinki.

Shen, Xiaonan Susan. 1991. Question intonation in natural speech: a study of Changsha Chinese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 21.1: 19-28.

Shenk, Petra Scott. 2006. The interactional and syntactic importance of prosody in Spanish-English bilingual discourse. International Journal of Bilingualism 10.2:179– 205.

Shepherd, Susan. 1990. Functions of repetition: variation in narrative and conversational discourse. in J. Edmondson, C. Feagin, and P. Mühlhäusler, eds., Development and diversity: linguistic variation across time and space, 629-638. Dallas: SIL and University of Texas, Arlington.

Sidnell, Jack. 2007 “Look”-prefaced turns in first and second position: Launching, interceding and redirecting action. Discourse Studies 9(3): 387-408

Sidnell, Jack. 2007 Repairing person reference in a small Caribbean community: Generic organization, local inflection. In T. Stivers & N.J. Enfield (Eds.) Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.

Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1983. On the interaction of word order and intonation: some OV constructions in Spanish. In Flora Klein-Andreu, ed., Discourse perspectives on syntax, 117-142. New York: Academic Press.

Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2002. Recipient activities: the particle no as a go-ahead response in Finnish conversations. In: Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson, eds., The language of turn and sequence. Oxford University Press.

Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2001. Simple answers to yes-no questions: the case of Finnish. In: Selting, Margret and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2002. Responding in conversation. A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Spielmann, Roger W. 1987. Preference and sequential organization in Algonquin. In Cowan, William, ed., Papers of the Eighteenth Algonquian Conference, 321-333. Ottawa: Carleton University.

Spielmann, Roger W. 1988. What’s so funny? Laughing together in Algonquin conversation. In Cowan, William, ed., Papers of the Nineteenth Algonquian Conference, 201-212. Ottawa: Carlton University.

Spielmann, Roger W. and Chief, Bertha. 1986. Requesting and rejecting in Algonquin: Notes on a conversation. In Actes du dix-septième Congrès des Algonquinistes, ed. William Cowan, 313-326. Ottowa: Carleton University.

Steensig, Jakob. 2001. Notes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkish conversation. In Margret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, eds., Studies in interactional linguistics, 259-286.

Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1984. Questions and responses in English conversation. Lund: Lund University Press.

Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1988. Questioning in conversation. In M. Meyer, ed., Questions and questioning, 304-325. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Stivers, Tanya. 2005. Modified repeats: one method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language in Social Interaction, 38:131-158.

Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment and affiliation during story telling: When nodding is a token of preliminary affiliation. Research on Language in Social Interaction, 41:29-55.

Stivers, Tanya and Nick J. Enfield, eds. 2007. Person reference in interaction:
linguistic, cultural and social perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

Stivers, Tanya and Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2006. A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society 35.3:367-392.

Strauss, Susan. 1993. Why 'this' and 'that' are not complete without 'it'. Chicago Linguistic Society, 403-417. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Strauss, Susan and Yumiko Kawanishi. 1996. Assessment strategies in Japanese, Korean, and American English. In Noriko Akatsuka, Shoichi Iwasaki, and Susan Strauss, eds., Japanese-Korean Linguistics 5, 149-165. Stanford: CSLI.

Streeck, Jürgen. 1993. Gesture as communication I: its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication monographs 60: 275-299.

Streeck, Jürgen. 1994. Gesture as communication II: the audience as co-author. Research on language and social interaction 27.3: 239-267.

Streeck, Jürgen. 1995. On projection. In Esther N. Goody, ed., Social intelligence and interaction, 87-110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Streeck, Jürgen. 2002. Grammars, words, and embodied meanings: on the uses and evolution of so and like. Journal of Communication 52 (3), 581-596.

Streeck, Jürgen and Ulrike Hartge. 1992. Gestures at the transition place. In Peter Auer and Aldo di Luzio, eds., The contextualization of language, 135-157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Streeck, Jürgen and Mark L. Knapp. 1992. The interaction of visual and verbal features in human communication. In Fernando Poyatos, ed., Non-verbal communication, 3-23. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Su, Lily Yi-Wen. 2004. Subjectification and the use of the complementizer SHUO. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 30:19-40.

Suh Kyung-Hee. 1992. A discourse analysis of the English tense-aspect-modality system. Unpublished PhD dissertation, UCLA.

Suh Kyung-Hee and Kyu-hyun Kim. 1992.The Korean modal marker kyess as a marker of affect. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 2. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Suzuki, Ryoko. 1990. The role of particles in Japanese gossip. BLS 16: 315-324.

Suzuki, Ryoko. 1999. Grammaticization in Japanese: a study of pragmatic particle-ization. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Swerts, Marc and R. Geluykens. 1993. The prosody of information units in spontaneous monologue. Journal of pragmatics 15.7: 567-584.

Swerts, Marc and Ronald Geluykens. 1994. Prosody as a marker of information flow in spoken discourse. Language and Speech 37.1: 21-43.

Szatrowski, Polly. 1986. The use of Japanese tense-aspect forms for vividness effect and participant tracking in conversations about past experiences. Journal of Asian Culture 9: 102-124. UCLA Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures.

Szatrowski, Polly. 1987. "Pastness" and "narrative events" in Japanese conversational narratives. In Russell Tomlin, ed., Coherence and grounding in discourse, 409-433. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Szatrowski, Polly. 1987. A discourse analysis of Japanese invitations. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 270-284.

Szatrowski, Polly. 2000. Relation between gaze, head nodding and aizuti 'back channel' at a Japanese company meeting. Berkeley Linguistics Society 26: 283-294.

Szatrowski, Polly. 2002. When do Japanese speakers co-construct utterances? In Maari Noda and Patricia Wetzel, eds., Language in culture. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

Szatrowski, Polly. 2002. Gaze, head nodding and aizuti 'back channel utterances' in information presenting activities. Japanese-Korean Linguistics 11: 119-132.

Szatrowski, Polly. 2002. Syntactic projectability and co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 28: 315-326.

Szczepek Reed, B. 2004. Turn-final intonation revisited. Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation 97-117, In. E. Couper-Kuhlen and C. Ford, eds. Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Tai, James H-Y. and Wenzhe Hu. 1991. Functional Motivations for the So-called 'Inverted sentences' in Beijing conversational discourse, Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 26, 75-104.

Takagi, Tomoyo. 1999. 'Questions' in argument sequences in Japanese. Human Studies 22: 397-423.

Takagi, Tomoyo. 2001. Sequence management in Japanese child-adult interaction. PhD dissertation, UC Santa Barbara.

Takagi, Tomoyo. 2002. Contextual resources for inferring unexpressed referents in Japanese conversation. Pragmatics 12.2: 135-182.

Takanashi, Hiroko. Stance differential in parallelism: dialogic syntax of argumentation in Japanese. In Nemeth, Eniko, ed., Pragmatics in 2000: Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 2, 570-582. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.

Tanaka, Hiroko. 1999. Turn-taking in Japanese conversation: a study in grammar and interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Tanaka, Hiroko. 2000. Turn-projection in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Research on language and social interaction 33.1: 1-38.

Tanaka, Hiroko. 2000. The particle ne as a turn-management device in Japanese conversation. Journal of pragmatics 32.8: 1135-1176.

Tanaka, Hiroko. 2001. Adverbials for turn projection in Japanese: toward a demystification of the "telepathic" mode of communication. Language in Society 30: 559-587.

Tanaka, Hiroko. 2004. Prosody for marking transition-relevance places in Japanese conversation: the case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objects. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Cecilia E. Ford, eds., Sound patterns in interaction, 63-96. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Tanaka, Hiroko. 2005. Grammar and the “timing” of social action: Word order and preference organization in Japanese. Language in Society 34:3: 389-430.

Tannen, Deborah. 1987. Repetition and variation as spontaneous formulaicity in conversation. Language 63:574-605.

Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Interpreting interruption in conversation. Papers from the 25th annual regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part II: Parasession on Language in Context, 266-287. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Tannen, Deborah. 1991. Talking voices: repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tannen, Deborah, ed. 1993. Framing in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tao, Hongyin. 1992. NP intonation units and referent identification. BLS 18:237-247.

Tao, Hongyin. 1996. Units in Mandarin conversation: prosody, discourse and grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Tao, Hongyin. 1999. The grammar of demonstratives in Mandarin conversational discourse: a case study. Journal of Chinese linguistics 27.1: 69-103.

Tao, Hongyin. 1999. Body movement and participant alignment in Mandarin conversational organization. Chicago Linguistic Society 35: The Panels, 125-139.

Tao, Hongyin. 2003. Toward an Emergent View of Lexical Semantics. Language and Linguistics 4.4: 837-856.

Tao, Hongyin. 2003. A usage-based approach to argument structure: 'remember' and 'forget' in spoken English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8.1: 75–95.

Tao, Hongyin. 2003. Turn initiators in spoken English: a corpus-based approach to interaction and grammar. In Pepi Leistyna and Charles F. Meyer, eds., Corpus analysis: language structure and language use, 187-207. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Tao, Hongyin. 2007. A Corpus-Based Investigation of Absolutely and Related Phenomena in Spoken American English. Journal of English Linguistics 35.1.

 Tao, Hongyin and Michael J. McCarthy. 2001. Understanding non-restrictive which-clauses in spoken English, which is not an easy thing. Language Sciences 23: 651-677.

Tao, Hongyin and Sandra A. Thompson. 1991. English Backchannels in Mandarin Conversation: a Case Study of Superstratum Pragmatic 'Interference': Journal of Pragmatics 16.2: 61-75.

Tao, Hongyin and Sandra A. Thompson. 1994. The discourse and grammar interface: preferred clause structure in Mandarin conversation. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 29.3: 1 - 34.