a free peer-reviewed web journal and archive devoted to the study of the languages of the Himalayas
Home
Articles [cumulative list]
Book Reviews and Notices [cumulative list]
Field Reports [cumulative list]
Archive Series [grammars, dictionaries, text collections]
Subscription (no fee)
About the Journal
Editorial and Advisory Boards
Submissions
Style Sheet
Support HL
Useful Links
Search HL Website
ImageAbstract

van Driem, George. 2011. 'Tibeto-Burman subgroups and historical grammar.' Himalayan Linguistics Journal 10.1 [Special Issue in Memory of Michael Noonan and David Watters]. 31–39.

Several distinct strains of thought on subgrouping, presented in memory of David Watters and Michael Noonan, are united by a golden thread. Tamangic consists of Tamangish and maybe something else, just as Shafer would have wanted it. Tamangic may represent a wave of peopling which washed over the Himalayas after Magaric and Kiranti but before Bodish. There is no such language family as Sino-Tibetan. The term ‘trans-Himalayan’ for the phylum merits consideration. A residue of Tibeto-Burman conjugational morphology shared between Kiranti and Tibetan does not go unnoticed, at least twice. Black Mountain Mönpa is not an East Bodish language, and this too does not go unnoticed.

Keywords: Tibeto-Burman, subgrouping, Tamangic , Tamangish, Limbu, Tibetan, Black, Mountain Mönpa, Michael Noonan, David Watters, Richard Keith Sprigg

[Full Article (593 KB)]

 

Updated July 11, 2011

Contact the webmaster at .
ISSN 1544-7502